• 欢迎访问华信创(北京)认证中心网站,我们将竭诚为您提供客观公正的认证服务。
您现在的位置:首页 > 首页管理 > 新闻聚焦

重要消息:国际绿色和平组织退出FSC

从国际林产工业专家处获悉,绿色和平组织网站今年3月26日发布消息称退出FSC。

有专家说,世界自然基金会和绿色和平组织是FSC的爸爸和妈妈,是他们诞生了FSC。然而,早在2014年8月初,绿色和平组织就宣称在保护俄罗斯剩余的原始森林上,FSC的认证体系是失败的。


Amsterdam, The Netherlands – Greenpeace International announced today it is not renewing its membership in the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), a global timber certification scheme for which the NGO was a founding member 25 years ago. Matt Daggett, Global Campaign Leader for the Forest Campaign at Greenpeace International, said:

阿姆斯特丹,荷兰——国际绿色和平组织3月26日宣布其不再是森林管理委员会(FSC)的成员。FSC是25年前由非政府组织成立的全球木材认证计划,国际绿色和平组织是该计划的创始成员之一。Matt Daggett是国际绿色和平组织森林保护的领导者,他说:

“We are firmly committed to advancing the best possible forest protections for people, biodiversity, and the climate. We believe robust timber certification is a helpful but imperfect tool for protecting people’s rights and improving forest management, which is why Greenpeace International will not renew its Forest Stewardship Council membership nor participate as a member of any other timber certification scheme.”

“我们坚定地致力于推进对人类、生物多样性和气候最好的森林保护。我们认为木材认证是一个保护人类权利、改善森林管理的有用但并不完善的工具,所以绿色和平组织不会再继续是森林管理委员会成员,也不会再加入其他的木材认证计划。”

 “When implemented effectively, Forest Stewardship Council certification can protect people’s rights and improve forest management, but we no longer have confidence that FSC alone can consistently guarantee enough protection, especially when forests are facing multiple threats. FSC is not consistently applied across regions, especially where there’s weak governance.”

“如果有效地实施,森林管理委员会认证可以起到保护人类权利和改善森林管理的作用,但我们不再确信仅靠FSC可以始终提供足够的保护,尤其是当森林面临多重威胁时。FSC在跨区域时并不适用,特别是在治理薄弱的地方。”

“Some local Greenpeace offices that operate in countries with stronger governance may maintain FSC membership so that they can push for stronger implementation at a national level.”

“一些在治理较强的国家运作的绿色和平组织机构可能会维持FSC的成员资格,以便在国家层面推动更有力的实施。”

“Transparency is the foundation for effective accountability, for certification schemes, governments, and companies. For a certification scheme to be considered credible in 2018, I believe it must transparently publish the mapped boundaries of sourcing areas and assessment reports to allow external monitoring and input. We are calling on FSC and all certification schemes to act with urgency to improve their transparency.”

“透明度是有效的问责制、认证计划、政府和公司的基础。对于一个在2018年被认为可信的认证计划,我认为它必须透明地公布采购领域和评估报告的地图边界,允许外部监测和输入。我们呼吁FSC和所有认证计划采取行动,以提高透明度。”

“Timber certification is a helpful but insufficient tool in the struggle to save our forests – we’ve always asked companies to go above and beyond. We encourage companies to firstly reduce their use of virgin fibre and use recycled and responsible alternative fibre whenever they are available. When virgin wood fibre is required, we still encourage the use of 100% FSC, with additional due diligence.”

“木材认证在拯救我们的森林的斗争中是一个有用而又不充分的工具——我们总是要求公司超越。”我们鼓励公司首先减少使用原始纤维,并使用可再生和负责任的替代纤维。当需要使用原始木材纤维时,我们仍然鼓励使用100% FSC,并进行额外的尽职调查。”